Before anyone speaks, write down what success looks like: clear next steps, preserved trust, or agreed trade‑offs. Note potential failure modes, such as defensiveness or scope creep. With outcomes defined, you can compare approaches objectively, celebrate progress, and avoid rewarding clever lines that feel impressive but do not advance the work responsibly.
Assign roles that have believable incentives: a skeptical executive worried about risk, a product lead juggling deadlines, or a client guarding budget. Provide each role a short backstory, constraints, and desired gains. Motive clarity helps partners push realistically, ensuring the practice reflects genuine tension rather than theatrical conflict without meaningful business relevance.
Introduce realistic constraints like time pressure, partial data, or conflicting OKRs. Constraints expose habitual patterns—talking too fast, avoiding silence, or over‑explaining. When participants identify those tendencies, they can choose different moves: pausing, summarizing, or asking targeted questions. The constraint becomes a teacher, turning ordinary rehearsal into durable behavioral change and measurable progress.